Fans disagree with Roger Ebert’s vision for the worst comedy film of all time



On April 20, 2001, 20th Century Fox launched a surreal comedy in American theaters. Freddy got fingered was the brainchild of Canadian actor and comedian Tom Green, who wrote, directed and starred in the film.

Green, who at the time was in a relationship with Charlie’s Angels star Drew Barrymore, had spent the previous six years or so as the headline The Tom Green Show on MTV. The show mostly featured sketches and stunts consistent with Green’s signature shock comedy style. One of these stunts included scenes of the comedian sucking a cow’s udder in public.

VIDEO THINGS OF THE DAY

Despite its controversial style, Regency Enterprises studios still saw fit to invest $ 14 million in Green’s production. Freddy got fingered scenario.

Met the general disdain

The film synopsis for Freddy got fingered on Google reads, “Gord Brody (Tom Green) is a struggling cartoonist who tries to put on an animated spectacle to Hollywood executives. When he fails, he returns to his hometown with no choice but to live with his parents and his younger brother, Freddy (Eddie Kaye Thomas). ”

“His dad (Rip Torn) doesn’t approve of Gord’s career path and pushes him to become independent. which leads to dramatic consequences. ”

As soon as the film started showing in theaters, it was met with general contempt as audiences disapproved of the tropes featured in the story. Perhaps thanks to the shock value that came with it, a significant number of people still flocked to see for themselves. As a result, the producers’ losses were significantly mitigated, as the film grossed around $ 14.3 million at the box office nationally and globally.

Freddy got fingered Poster

via: Joblo

The following year, the film was nominated for eight Golden Raspberry awards, including Worst Screenplay, Worst Picture, Worst Actor, and Worst Director. RELATED: This Controversial Emma Roberts Film Was Voted Worst Independent Film Ever

I came across in very bad taste

Unlike most of the infamous award nominees, Green picked up his gongs in person and injected sarcasm into his acceptance speech. “When we decided to make this movie, we wanted to win a Razzie, so it’s a dream come true for me,” he joked. “It’s a totally, very proud moment for me … I wore this tuxedo to my wedding, which gives you an indication of what it means to me.”

This was just the start of the negative reviews. First in line was acclaimed film critic Roger Ebert. “This film does not scratch the bottom of the barrel,” he wrote on his official website. “This movie is not the bottom of the barrel. This movie is not the bottom of the barrel. This movie does not deserve to be mentioned in the same sentence with the barrels.”

As much as the fans were, Ebert was particularly disgusted with most of Green’s stunts, which were in very bad taste. “The movie is a 93-minute vomitorium of Tom Green doing things a geek at a carnival show would refuse. Six minutes into the movie’s start, his character jumps out of his car to wiggle a horse’s penis. is, we discover, a framing device – to be compared to a scene at the end of the film where he sprinkles his father with elephant sperm, directly at the source. ” RELATED: The Truth About ‘Sex and the Town’ Most Shocking Episode

The audience started to change their tone

Ebert’s credibility over the years has come from his ability to accept that no matter how much we care about a work of art, it remains subjective. He accepted that other generations could see a movie through a completely different lens than his.

Tom Green Freddy got fingered

via: Complex

He left this door open for Freddy got fingered, but with a disclaimer: “The day may come when Freddy got fingered is considered an important stage of neo-surrealism. The day may never come when it will be seen as funny. ”

Over time, Ebert’s hesitant prediction slowly but certainly began to come to fruition. As the film moved from theaters to home release on DVD, its fortunes began to change. For starters, he made $ 24.3 million from DVD sales alone.

The audience also started to change their tone. Reviews started to go from gloomy to – at worst, mixed. What most people find just loathsome attacks a lifestyle that is all about grim resentment and retaliatory games. Exaggerated nonsense, but it competes for dark and meaningful laughs, “read a review on Rotten Tomatoes.

Another postulated that it was actually these ends in the movie that made it an interesting watch. “This movie is utterly ridiculous and over the top and a lot of the humor is incredibly funny.” NEXT: Here’s Why Fans Think ‘Sleepless In Seattle’ Is Still Worth Watching


Drew Barrymore and Tom Greene's relationship ruined his career

Has Drew Barrymore’s Marriage Damaged Tom Green’s Career?

There may have been collateral damage after they broke up.

Read more


About the Author


Previous The NAU Film Series Returns With A Focus On 1971, Heritage Months | Filter
Next Wes Anderson is the curator of a French film series online in NYC before 'The French Dispatch'